Saturday, January 6, 2024

God Has Your Back

 

Be Still My Soul 


By Katherina von Schlegel
Jane Borthwick, Translator
Melody, Finlandia, by Jean Sibelius

 

Be still, my soul; the Lord is on thy side;
bear patiently the cross of grief or pain.
Leave to thy God to order and provide;
in every change He faithful will remain.
Be still, my soul; thy best, thy heav'nly Friend
through thorny ways leads to a joyful end. 

Be still, my soul; thy God doth undertake
to guide the future as He has the past.
Thy hope, thy confidence let nothing shake;
all now mysterious shall be bright at last.
Be still, my soul; the waves and winds still know
His voice who ruled them while He dwelt below. 

Be still, my soul; when dearest friends depart,
and all is darkened in the veil of tears,
then shalt thou better know His love, His heart,
who comes to soothe thy sorrow and thy fears.
Be still, my soul; thy Jesus can repay
from His own fullness all He takes away. 

Be still, my soul; the hour is hast'ning on
when we shall be forever with the Lord,
when disappointment, grief, and fear are gone,
sorrow forgot, love's purest joys restored.
Be still, my soul; when change and tears are past,
all safe and blessed we shall meet at last. * 

 

The Lord of hosts is with us;
The God of Jacob is our refuge. Selah
 

Come, behold the works of the Lord,
Who has made desolations in the earth.
He makes wars cease to the end of the earth;
He breaks the bow and cuts the spear in two;
He burns the chariot in the fire.
 

Be still, and know that I am God;
I will be exalted among the nations,
I will be exalted in the earth!
 

The Lord of hosts is with us;
The God of Jacob is our refuge. Selah

(Psalm 46:7-11 NKJV) **

  

*  https://library.timelesstruths.org/music/Be_Still_My_Soul/

** https://biblehub.com/nkjv/psalms/46.htm

 

The Courts Cannot Cherry Pick the Constitution

It has been three years since the demonstration and riot in Washington, D.C. on January 6, 2021.  The details of that event are commonly known and will not be restated here.  It was a national tragedy, the sorted details of which the American people are not being allowed to forget. 

Estimates vary. The total number of demonstrators was thought to be as few as “several thousand.”  The protest organizers expected as many as 30,000.  Some law enforcement sources thought there were as many as 80,000.  The Associated press estimated 10,000. [1]  No one knows for sure, but I have seen estimates of the number of rioters who entered the Capitol Building that go as high as 2,000. [2] 

Deliberations about the Former President's alleged culpability in the matter continue to drag on and on in the courts.  The rhetoric of the 2024 presidential campaigns is rife with it as the candidates attempt to create a political advantage by pointing the finger of blame.  The Colorado Supreme Court and the Maine Secretary of State have ordered President Trump’s name to be removed from the Republican primary ballot. 

The Colorado Supreme Court has found that President Trump is ineligible to hold office according to the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution because his actions on January 6th met the definition of insurrection, at a time when he was an office holder sworn to uphold the constitution.  The U.S. Supreme Court is in the process of rendering a decision, and that should (but probably won’t) put this thing to bed – one way or another.  Of course, the broadcast and print news media are having a feeding frenzy. 

Please stay with me while I share a few thoughts with you about Donald Trump’s current eligibility to hold office. 

The 14th Amendment, Sections 2 and 3 read: 

2: Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State. 

3: No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability. 

The legal definition of insurrection is: 

18 U.S. Code § 2383 - Rebellion or Insurrection 

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. [3] 

The crime of sedition does not appear to have been alleged, but it is often mentioned in connection with insurrection, and a definition by one source is provided: 

Generally, sedition is conduct or speech that incites individuals to violently rebel against the authority of the government. Insurrection includes the actual acts of violence and rebellion. [4] 

After a reasonable effort, I was able to find that President Trump has been indited in Federal Court in Washington, D.C. on four felony counts: conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding, and conspiracy against rights. [5]  He faces 13 counts of election interference in Georgia. [6] 

The presumption of innocence is not guaranteed by the constitution, but it is the law in several states.  The U.S. Supreme Court found the presumption of innocence to be necessary for a fair trial in the case of Taylor v. Kentucky.  The accused are not required to prove their innocence.  It is the job of the prosecution to prove the defendant guilty – beyond a reasonable doubt. [7] 

No report was found that Donald Trump has been indited, tried, or convicted for insurrection or sedition.  Former President Trump is an American citizen.  The 5th and 14th Amendments guarantee him the right to  due process of law.  In my opinion, it is therefore unconstitutional and against case law for the Colorado Supreme court to remove his name from the Republican primary ballot for behavior that meets the definition of insurrection.

The Colorado Supreme Court cannot cherry pick the rights of American Citizens.  The 14th Amendment guarantees us the right to equal treatment under the law.  Common criminals are afforded the presumption of innocence every day.  Isn’t a former president entitled to the same rights as a common criminal?  His legal rights cannot be taken away from President Trump simply because the Colorado Court doesn’t like him or agree with his political views. 

Make no mistake.  Trump’s behavior after the 2020 election was intemperate, reckless, and willful.  I am not trying to excuse him from the responsibility for his actions.  All I am trying to do is to speak out against an obvious abuse of all our rights under the U.S. Constitution. 

Speaking of which, American citizens have the right to vote for the candidate of our choice.  The Colorado Supreme Court even went so far as to prohibit write-in votes for Trump to be counted.  Monkey-see-monkey-do.  It appears that Maine is only the first of several other states that will try to keep Mr. Trump off their ballots. 

This is not North Korea.  It is America.  Barring reasonable limits keeping convicted felons from holding office, the government has no right to tell us who we can vote for.

 

Sunday, December 31, 2023

Gotcha

The United States of America is faced with a number of serious challenges; including wars in the Middle East and Eastern Europe, inflation, an obscene national debt, serious balance of trade deficits, opposition from China and the Russian Federation, a nuclear North Korea, the possibility of a nuclear Iran, porous  borders with Canada and Mexico, violent crime, infiltration by drug cartels and terrorist organizations, deaths from fentanyl overdose, and many others.  Many of these challenges threaten our national security and the peace and safety of our people. 

American voters need to be informed concerning where the presidential primary candidates stand on these important issues, and what they intend to do about them if elected.  That is why I am offended when candidates are asked to answer “gotcha” questions.  Serious discussion is needed in which candidates are given the opportunity to explain their views in detail. 

A gotcha question is a trick question that is designed to cause someone to offer an answer they can - and will - be criticized for.  They are a verbal ambush.  Often there is no good answer available that will not generate controversy and cause the person being questioned to lose credibility.  In fact, the motivation for asking the question is to harm the one who is being asked to respond. 

During the 2008 presidential election, Katie Couric had a series of interviews with then Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin.  During one of these she asked Gov. Palin about her reading habits – what publications she had recently read.  Ms. Couric was obviously informed in advance that candidate Palin was not well read.  The question temporarily left the flummoxed candidate fumbling for an answer.  The object was clearly to give the audience the impression that Gov. Palin’s views were ill-informed or even ignorant. 

Ms. Couric has spent her entire working life as a journalist.  To my knowledge she has no training or experience in management, supervision, or public administration.  Perhaps that is why she didn’t understand that the Vice Presidency is not a game of Jeopardy or Trivial Pursuit.  True, the Vice President must be well informed, but their most reliable information will not come from the print and broadcast news media. 

Katie Couric got accolades from the liberal media for the series of interviews, including the Walter Cronkite Award for Journalism Excellence. What she actually did was to stop Palin’s rising popularity in its tracks and cast question on John McCain’s judgement. McCain’s senior campaign strategist, Steve Schmidt, said, “… it was the most consequential interview from a negative perspective that a candidate for national office has gone through.[1] Immagine that.  Katie got an award for making a good candidate look bad. 

Recently, Republican primary candidate Nikki Haley was asked about the reason for the Civil War by a man in a New Hampshire town hall meeting.  Her response included comments about government and individual freedom.  The man took issue with her for not mentioning slavery in her answer. * (It is not clear whether the man was a reporter.)  She later tried to clarify her views by stating that “Of course the Civil War was about slavery.” [2]  

The press has jumped on the opportunity to speculate that this could be the end of her candidacy.  We have probably not heard the last of it. 

It is not my purpose here to debate whether the Civil War was about slavery, or not.  The point is that no matter how Nikki Haley answered the question, it would provoke controversy, and the press has taken full advantage of it. 

Nikki Haley was the Governor of South Carolina, which is a very conservative Southern state that was part of the Confederacy.  She served as Ambassador to the United Nations during the Trump Administration, and President Trump has often been characterized, unfairly, as a racist by the liberal establishment.  Thus, it is easy to deceitfully portray her as being on the wrong side of the race issue. 

I am not diminishing the importance of race relations.  We need to know a candidate’s stance.  That is why it should not be the subject of shallow discussion prompted by trick questions that can be misconstrued by a biased media in 30 second sound bites. 

Barring unforeseen circumstances, it appears that, (due to his popularity among Republican voters), Donald Trump will be their candidate for President of the United States.  Nikki Haley would make a good candidate for Vice President.  She polls well against Joe Biden, which could help Trump win.  Since she resigned as his UN Ambassador, however, Donald Trump may be reluctant to have her as his running mate.  Nonetheless, her run for the Republican presidential nomination now may serve as a foot in the door for 2028.  Who knows?  The point here is she should not be removed from consideration over a gotcha question. 

Have a Happy New Year!  May it be safe and prosperous.  Please don’t drink and drive. 

 

*  For an example of the argument for slavery as the cause of the Civil War see: Robert E. Lee and Me: A Southerner’s Reckoning with the Myth of the Lost Cause, by Ty Seidule. Griffin. (2022).  This should not be understood as an endorsement of Seidule's views.